Controversial proposals for a ‘luxury’ holiday park on the outskirts of Catsfield have been unanimously refused by Rother planners.
On Thursday (September 7), Rother District Council’s planning committee considered an outline application seeking permission to build 211 holiday lodges at the Normanhurst Estate — a 140 hectare parcel of private land within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).
Photo of the site
With the scheme recommended for refusal, representatives for applicant Greystoke Land sought to impress the committee by laying out what they considered to be benefits of the scheme, including an economic boost for the district as a whole.
Councillors ultimately judged that these benefits would be outweighed by the harm to the AONB, however.
Cllr Jimmy Stanger (Ind), who put forward the motion to refuse the application, said:
“My [concerns] just come down to size and scale really. Where it is, in the AONB and the potential impact.
Amenity buildings
“I’ve walked around the area and we’ve seen it first hand. The size of these things, within the trees, within the environment. It is going to be very hard to hide and not to have any impact.
“But I think it is a very good application. If it were somewhere else, it would probably go through easier, but at the moment the balance is weighing towards the AONB.”
Artist's impression of the site
Several councillors put forward similar views. They included Cllr John Barnes (Con), who said:
“I suspect if this were not in the AONB I would be looking at it quite sympathetically, because it seems to me this is an exciting concept and one that actually could benefit the area in substantial terms of income.
“The problem is the harm it will do. It may be short term but is irreversible.”
Following further discussion the application was rejected in a unanimous vote.
The decision was in line with advice from officers, who had said the development would result in “significant adverse impact on the landscape character, ecological features, and habitat dynamics of the AONB”. They also said the development would have had a significant impact on the village of Catsfield itself.
The refusal also takes into account concerns about the site’s access plans and sheer size of the scheme, which officers had described as being “akin to the development of a new village within the AONB.”
Objections had also been raised by a number of other parties, including: Natural England; East Sussex Highways; the county council’s ecologist; seven nearby parish councils; Sussex Ramblers; and the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), among many others.
The proposals had also proven to be unpopular with local residents, who had submitted more than 730 letters of objection.
For further information on the proposals see application reference RR/2023/217/P on the Rother District Council website.
Teenager In Custody On Crawley Attempted Murder Charge
Appeal Following Assault In Hastings
Road Closed As Armed Police Attend Incident In Worthing
Lewes District Council Placed In Planning Special Measures
‘Life-Changing’ Medication For Asthma Patients Now Available In Sussex
Arms Factory Demonstrator Disrupts Brighton & Hove Council Meeting
Patients Forced Into 'Pharmacy Bingo' - As Survey Says Medicine Shortages 'Beyond Critical'
Appeal for information After Man Dies In Hastings Collision
Wealden To Hold National Dementia Action Week This Month
Brighton Food Festival To Be Charged For Mud Bath